Lichess vs chess com reddit

chess.com vs lichess. See I hate chess.com's p2w stuff cuz it's way to expensive for any casual player. Though it has a very good UI and the analysis tools. Its easy to navigate and it's ratings make more sense. On the other hand lichess is free and provides infinite stuff. Its UI is kinda bad though.Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app.Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.Lichess forbids engine use in correspondence games. Using an engine is cheating, just using the board eg to analyze yourself and move pieces around isn't cheating I would say. It should be noted that the official rules of the governing body of correspondence chess (The ICCF - International Correspondence Chess Federation) allow engine use.It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.Analysis comparison Chess.com vs Lichess. My Rh8+ is considered a game losing blunder by Chess.com (going from +2.80 to -2.63). When the forced Kxh8 is followed by Nxe5 the position is suddenly evaluated as +8.30. Lichess assesses the position as around +16 both before and after Rxh8.EnCroissantCheckmate. Overall, I think chess.com is better because it has a better UI, playing experience, and tactics trainer. However, there are still some areas in which lichess is better than chess.com (for instance, it is 100% free, its analysis goes to a greater depth, it has a classical rating pool, etc.)View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. chess.com vs lichess experience for noob players . I just started playing on chess.com app. my elo is 1200 peak rapid on lichess and currently at 850 on chess.com. My biggest takeaway is every mf and their mother on chess.com tries to force check with queen bishop at the ...I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.If you compare what rating percentile you're in on Lichess and on chess.com, it usually becomes very obvious that a huge share of chess.com users is beginners and very casual players. I'm 99% sure the chess-com percentiles are based on every account that has ever joined the site (ie: people who lost one or two games and never came back) because ...Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where “2200”s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.The fact that you prefer lichess over chess.com is not science, it's just your personal opinion. No matter how many times you say that "lichess is better than chess.com", that's just your opinion, not a general truth. I already mentioned in my comment a couple of features from chess.com that I prefer over lichess.Thank you for watching :) Have a good day!Follow me on twitter https://www.twitter.com/DoseChessContact by email [email protected]___Links for th...r/chess • Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.chesstempo estimate via blitz tactics rating: 1576. dudeski_robinson's conversion formula: 1497. unrealduck's converter: 1277. chessgoals (via lichess classical): 1264. I don't have a FIDE rating, but given my national rating the only estimates that sound close are the last 2. 11.Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation. After playing some rapid games on both platforms, my rating on lichess is 2024 and my rating on chess.com is 1919. However, with these ratings i'm in the top 6.9% on lichess and top 0.3% on chess.com. This is a huge difference considering I should be relatively close to where the ratings converge. The 0.3th percentile on lichess is at around ...Due to marketing and domain/brand name, chesscom is the natural first place to go for someone new to chess or someone who just saw some streamers etc. You don't hear about Lichess until you've gained a bit more experience. That said, that the average Lichess player is better doesn't matter - you're paired against players at your level on both ...Serene Supakkul · Follow 14 min read · Sep 11, 2021 Ah yes, the age-old debate of Chess.com vs Lichess: which is the ~ superior ~ chess server?Many users prefer Lichess's UI and UX to Chess.com's. There are also philosophical differences between the two sites: Lichess is ad free and subsists on donations, while Chess.com is a profit-over-everything-else business. People don't typically like paywalls for features when free alternatives exist. Furthermore, there are cultural differences ...On the other hand, lichess offers free unlimited puzzles, free analysis, free retry mistakes, and free lessons (for mate, forking, and whatever. I use lichess primarily for puzzles, training or playing when I feel like I want to improve and then bring my new battle skills to chess.comThe difference at that level is the starting point. The fact that Lichess starts at 1500 and Chess.com at 800, means that if you're around 1100 at Chess.com you're meeting people that gained 300 elo, if you meet people around 1500 at Lichess you can meet many new users (usually they have a question mark on the rating).A year ago I was rated about 2100 Rapid on Lichess (peak of 2150). I found it relatively easy to float around 2100. I then took a break from chess and closed my old account. I needed a solid break from chess. I recently came back and started a new account. I started off badly and floated around 1900 for a couple of months I was rusty and ...On average, chess.com players are definitely stronger than lichess players. This has primarily to do with the rating system of lichess. It is designed to be higher than usual, not only that it gives you a high rating from a fresh account, the rating gain (per game) is also enormous. If you have a "new account" on lichess, you can already ...Puzzles, those are free elsewhere. I think it's worth it if you want to improve. You can essentially get it free on lichess but personally I find the analysis easier to digest on chess.com. I had diamond for a year. Insides are ok but you will check it maybe few times. Unlimited puzzles and engine analysis is good.Lichess is just a better layout and chess.com seems to have more cheaters on it. Chess.com also wants money for legit everything including tactics, and chess.com …Last week I posted a post about making a wooden cat themed chess set and today the first Queen completed the sample. 1 / 7. 1.9K. 76. r/chessbeginners. Join. • 12 days ago. a month playing and 150 elo.Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Lichess has three neutral net bots trained on games done by actual players at rating level 1100 (Maia1), 1500 (Maia5) and 1900 (Maia9). They're still a little weird but it's much easier to believe they're humans with quirks and are probably better training than the regular chess bots. There's no easy comparison.There is not inflatory about it and by always trying to compare lichess ratings to chess.com ratings you are pretending like the chess.com ratings are "true" or "correct", when actually it is the lichess ratings that use a more sophisticated rating system (Glicko-2) - chess.com used to use Glicko-1, but then ~2 years ago they removed RD from profiles, so possible …Lichess or Chess.com, which is better for a new player? : r/chess r/chess • 3 yr. ago by _-Comic-_ View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Lichess or Chess.com, which is better for a new player? Could someone tell me the advantages and disadvantages of each one? This thread is archivedHey, everyone, got this mate on accident earlier. Still pretty new to chess (been playing on and off for about a year now) and I’ve been exclusively playing on Chess.com. Rated ~600 in rapid but have been really enjoying 3 min blitz games recently (rated 200-300). Since I joined this sub I’ve seen a lot of mentions of Lichess.The fact that you prefer lichess over chess.com is not science, it's just your personal opinion. No matter how many times you say that "lichess is better than chess.com", that's just your opinion, not a general truth. I already mentioned in my comment a couple of features from chess.com that I prefer over lichess.Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz. Coming from someone whos played thousands of of games on chess.com and hundreds on lichess (2 different accounts per website) lichess is more casual, and is free. They offer free lessons and tactics. With chess.com the player base is bigger, they offer much more efficient and a wide variety of learning tools.For instance facing a 1500 on Chess.com is pretty manageable as long as you're thinking, but facing a 1200 on Chess Arena feels like I'm playing a 1800-2000 player from Chess.com. I'm not the best, but I've beaten a few 2000/2100 players, drawn against some national master players, and generally have no worries playing anyone under like 1500.My son has a chesskids.com ranking of 1000, and we made a deal that if he reached rank 800 on chess.com, he'd get a reward. He says he prefers chesskids.com because he thinks there's a lot of cheaters on chess.com. I believe he's making an excuse as far as the chess.com cheaters are concerned. Likely, if he were better, he'd probably rank up ...For an small background story, i am an 1905 Fide rated from india with avg 2350 in lichess & chess.com.I found most people & certain websites saying that chess.com & lichess rating only vary by 100-200 points to fide rating. Much to my surprise this wasn't even close to my personal experience of 350 points inflation and a lot of people i know whose rating vary from a minimum of 300 to some ...Played chess for 2.5 years and I've never seen anything like this...a literal zombie cheater account that can ignore chess.com's account closure and continue to play rated games. r/chessbeginners • Pretty effective tactic to play with the London that has gotten me mate three times in the last five games I have playedOn chess.com I got to 1064 in blitz putting me at around 60th percentile. On lichess a 1300 only puts me around 25th percentile. Are the rankings…Chesstempo has a very huge library and they also do something similar to Lichess where they make tactics puzzles based on games played on their server. Correction: chesstempo uses master games, not games played on their server. Subjectively, the feel of the problems is quite different from Lichess problems.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. lichess vs chess.com ratings question . Hey all, when the new chess.com app came out it prompted me to change over to lichess. ... Actually, the percentile between lichess and chess.com is way different, as there are very little titled players in lichess compared to chess ...Jan 1, 2023 · Chess.com Rating vs. FIDE and USCF. The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100, and the Chess.com equivalent is slightly under 500. Between 100 and 1750, the 400-point gap shrinks as the rating-level increases. There is a mate in 2 (1. Rxa2+ Bxa2 2. Nc2#), but the position after 1…Bxa2 is K+N vs K+B, and chess.com would call the game a draw by "insufficient material" before white even gets the chance to play 2. Nc2#. Engine evaluation doesnt care about a faulty insufficient material implementation of GUI.1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.Analysis comparison Chess.com vs Lichess. My Rh8+ is considered a game losing blunder by Chess.com (going from +2.80 to -2.63). When the forced Kxh8 is followed by Nxe5 the position is suddenly evaluated as +8.30. Lichess assesses the position as around +16 both before and after Rxh8.Lichess's interface felt slicker when playing fast chess. In fact, on Lichess some players would play bullet at 15 seconds and 30 seconds time controls. Pretty wild. And on Lichess newer players like Penguin made their name. Carlsen played some tournaments on Lichess for fun and when he won he would donate the reward to the next tournament.You're comparing two different pools of players. Chess.com is the most popular Chess site on the internet so you have a massive playerbase of casuals bringing down the average. Lichess on the other hand is a site you play on if for whatever reason you don't like chess.com and felt the need to look for an alternative so naturally the average player on lichess is stronger.Magnus Carlsen cheating online against GM Naroditsky in the Lichess Titled Arena, December 2021 — conclusive video proof from Carlsen's live stream. clips.twitch.tv This thread is archivediamspookydooky • 6 mo. ago. chess.com is better for beginners because of its quick analysis / lessons and has better scheduled tournaments. lichess can offer similar analysis for free, albeit likely more cumbersome for a newbie. Services vs. free is the choice you're making. Both are excellent, many people use both. [deleted] • 6 mo. ago. The chess.com puzzles have kinda bizarre ratings , they don't make much sense until you get over 2000 . Some of the ones rated 400 or even lower can have a trick to it, and many of the ones between about 1400-1900 are "do this aggressive looking move and the problem ends", where it is actually quite a lot of work to correctly calculate that that is the best move.1. Scyther99 • 1 yr. ago. I played a lot of puzzles on both sites and I like Lichess puzzles a lot more, because they are more realistic and varied imo. Chess.com puzzles are more flashy, usually some kind a sacrifice, so I immediately look for those kind of things. Liches puzzles are more often quiet moves, winning a pawn to win favourable ...Already the third also had 400 points difference between blitz and rapid, with around 50 games each. Given that the number of Lichess players is a few orders higher than the number of kids in my chess club (too bad), the probability of a stable 400 point difference caused merely by a statistic fluke skyrockets.Lichess looks for people that have played in the last week, afaik chess.com looks for people that have played 20 games in the last 90 days. I have argued in the past that lichess' selection skews towards stronger players and I still feel that way, but this is a massive difference we have to account for.chesstempo estimate via blitz tactics rating: 1576. dudeski_robinson's conversion formula: 1497. unrealduck's converter: 1277. chessgoals (via lichess classical): 1264. I don't have a FIDE rating, but given my national rating the only estimates that sound close are the last 2. 11.There's no incentive to being a Lichess patron for someone that's asking for subscriptions to help learn, which in this case would be chess.com learning resources / articles, or chess24's resources. (Just adding that I agree that you should be a Lichess patron if possible to support the site, and I recently became one as well.)To summarize, lichess ratings generally tend to be higher than chess.com ratings, which could indicate that lichess ratings may not be as accurate. However, it is important to consider the differences in player pools, rating algorithms, and the subjective nature of rating systems. Personal experiences can vary, and it is ultimately up to the ...Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app. Cheating is absolutely rife on lichess. Amongst the lower rated players, 1200 to 1600. The amount of times I've won major pieces in the first 10-15 moves and the guy is clueless, then all of a sudden they come back with moves that match stockfish move for move 100% and 'win'. There's a pattern too, they take exactly the same amount of time per ...My thoughts: Lichess is very functional, but also very ugly (super subjective) (EDIT: I play almost exclusively on mobile apps) For some reason, the super inflated ratings bother me. They are entirely detached from reality. Chess.com is obviously inflated relative to USCF or FIDE, but not nearly as bad. It has way more stuff than lichens, lessons, drills, daily puzzles, chess engine (and yes, I did do a comparison. I used the Chess.com engine against the lichess stockfish engine, and the chess.com engine reacted much faster and did better than stockfish 8 in lichess). And also, some other game modes like puzzle battle and 4 player chess.Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation.2777 puzzle rating on lichess, can confirm that I'm not 2700 FIDE. Doesn't really mean anything since they're not timed and aren't correlated to your regular chess rating. If you'd post some games with your thought process it'd be easier to answer the question about your playing strength. •. A monkey could get 2000 randomly on puzzles.Chess.com vs lichess I'm a novice and was thinking of becoming a subscribing member to chess.com for the lessons and tactics. I understand chess.com has a nicely structured lesson plan but lichess seems to have everything a absolute beginner would need for free..Chess.com and lichess use different rating systems, and give different ratings to new players. Chess.com ratings end up being consistently lower, but that doesn't correspond to you being in a lower percentile of players on chess.com (what parent was talking about). For reference though, I'm 2000 lichess rapid, and 1700 chess.com rapid.In the last month the mod team on Lichess has included about 50 people, and that doesn't include dev time working on new cheat detection features, which would put the number even higher. One of our devs had been working hard on an update to the automated detection that just landed about a week ago and it works great.This. Lichess has written an explanation of the different rating systems. Here is someone trying explore which rating in one system is equivalent to a rating in another (so chess.com vs lichess, chess.com vs FIDE, etc).. On average I would guess Lichess has a slightly stronger pool of players, but that is because chess.com is most likely the first site beginners find.The engine will take you through your mistakes and blunders and you can try to correct them. Its a lot less intuitive and helpful than the coach feature on chess.com but its something. Lichess could be a lot better from a UI/UX perspective but im guessing they are operating with less than 5% of the resources chess.com has.This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ... And all the people I have talked to always bring this argument about the rating being more legit on chess.com and I just wanted people to know the entire reality about it, i.e., why lichess rating is inflated in a certain rating range but why chess.com rating is inflated in another rating range (it just depends on the parameters.Lichess's rating can be 200-300 points higher than chess.com because the default starting rating (which is a convention choice in any rating system) is 300 points higher than chess.com 's one (1500 vs. 1200). You could say that chess.com 's rating is closer to actual FIDE rating, but that's also inaccurate because 1) those ratings refer to ...Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.Lichess is filled with cheats like this. You gotta feel sorry for these cheats. ITs so funny--cheating at silly free online chess. the 2000-2100 player pool is INFESTED with cheats on lichess. The scripts must be set at that level because I see a lot of this type of player :) IRWIN, the anti-cheat software at lichess needs an update.chess.com's paid analysis is full of gimmicky, buggy and misleading features. If you want a quick full-game analysis report, you're much better off importing to lichess anyway, so that part is just not worth it. For puzzles, chesstempo has much better puzzles than both chess.com and lichess.Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where “2200”s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.The stigma of lichess rating inflation comes from two things. The player pool used to be much weaker, so I would hit 1400 a few years ago, take a long break from chess, then come back stronger but loose points because the "average" player had gotten a bit strongerLichess is about 370-400 points higher than chess.com. To me, its due to their rating formula using a higher initial rating than chess.com. They have a superiority complex where they think people will face more similar skill if they raise all the ratings up with their glicko-2 rating system (chess.com apparently uses a glicko-1 rating system), but the ratings look just too high there.Accessibility: Enable blind mode. lichess.org Play lichess.org. Create a game Arena tournaments Swiss tournaments Simultaneous exhibitionschess.com starting rating is a few hundred points lower than on lichess, so you can think of it like all the ratings are shifted slightly by that amount (this is only really true for lower levels where there are a lot of players, at higher levels chess.com ratings are super inflated).I think for these validated players - maybe pulling their historical lichess ratings and their historical FIDE ratings could help enlarge the sample size. AnnualUse9202 • 2 yr. ago. I like this analysis. My peak ratings: LiChess Blitz = 1953 * 0.9074 + 41.4256 = 1814. LiChess Rapid = 2075 * 0.7962 + 309.9946 = 1962.This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.We get one of these "which chess side is better" threads like 2-3 times a week. Problem with them is that the "results" will be favoring lichess. Even if chess.com …Similar to how (usually at least) online and OTB FIDE scores will be different. That's true. Lichess uses 1500 as the starting rating because that's what the Glicko system recommends. You can't compare the percentiles though. 95th percentile on Lichess rapid would be 2100 and a 2100 on Lichess would be much stronger than a 1500 on Chess.com.Dgt has recently released a much more affordable unit with plastic pieces and fast input time. The chessbrahs use it on stream. With this more affordable and durable board maybe getting this as an option in lichess would benefit a bigger set of players than before. I asked chess.com if they would eventually support a dgt board. The answer was no.IamCurioSo. • 1 yr. ago • Edited 1 yr. ago. Tricks you can do on the board: Save the game: hit the A1 square with a piece 3 times, white side control will blink, you can now turn off the board and restart the game later. Draw the game: put both kings in the white and blak center squares without any pieces around.Chess.com👎 •1000 ads •hard to use, Not use friendly •Askes for money, and help, annoys players! Gives 100000 messages per day! •Show offs, advertises!!! •Sells ads to non-premium accounts! And premium accounts pays money so all people are helping them make profit 💀 _____ Lichess is a free (really), libre, no-ads, open source ...I made the mistake of jumping straight into a super fast game in Lichess and made awful mistakes before resigning. I took some time to relearn my things, played against the computer, and did a Blitz game of 30 minutes on the Chess.com app and won it without much difficulty, raising me from the starting 800 to 900something.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Lichess is about 370-400 points higher than chess.com. To me, its due to their rating formula using a higher initial rating than chess.com. They have a superiority complex where they think people will face more similar skill if they raise all the ratings up with their glicko-2 rating system (chess.com apparently uses a glicko-1 rating system), but the ratings look just too high there.Old Lichess was harder I think, my rating in new Lichess is higher than old Lichess (now ~2000). Haven't used chesstempo so I can't comment. Despite my complaining I still appreciate Lichess because it's free. Puzzles in lichess now with the new version are very very very good at all levels.For an small background story, i am an 1905 Fide rated from india with avg 2350 in lichess & chess.com.I found most people & certain websites saying that chess.com & lichess rating only vary by 100-200 points to fide rating. Much to my surprise this wasn't even close to my personal experience of 350 points inflation and a lot of people i know whose rating vary from a minimum of 300 to some ...Lichess has always started players at a rating of 1500, the recommendation of the Glicko system. For several years, chess.com started players at a rating of 1200, despite also using the Glicko system. This difference in their ratings has largely persisted, at higher or lower levels the difference in player strength on the two websites is about ...Coming from someone whos played thousands of of games on chess.com and hundreds on lichess (2 different accounts per website) lichess is more casual, and is free. They offer free lessons and tactics. With chess.com the player base is bigger, they offer much more efficient and a wide variety of learning tools.The Comparison. Overall, not a huge fan of either site’s UX for these features but Chess.com’s flow and UI is a bit more intuitive than Lichess’s and the friends list is a great addition ...For what purpose? Shredder is a chess engine that's been, to my knowledge, irrelevant for a while. Shredder 13 is from 2016. Chess Tudor is designed to teach you how to play chess. I have no personal experience with it, but it's probably at least okay. Lichess is used for lots of different things, but primarily for playing chess online.Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really play IRL. Especially since the chess boom last year.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess vs. chess.com . Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comment sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. WilkerS1 • Additional comment actions. i wanna read more ...Lichess is objectively the better platform. that being said if you're willing to spend money ches.com has some features you might enjoy and lichess don't have. tl;dr : if you're not wiling to spend money lichess is the best option if you're willing to spend money and want everything in the same place , chess.com probably is. if you're willing ...There is not inflatory about it and by always trying to compare lichess ratings to chess.com ratings you are pretending like the chess.com ratings are "true" or "correct", when actually it is the lichess ratings that use a more sophisticated rating system (Glicko-2) - chess.com used to use Glicko-1, but then ~2 years ago they removed RD from ...At "lower" levels (<1800 lichess / <1600 chess.com) there is a huge difference between the ratings. At those levels lichess is just much higher than chess.com rating. But at relatively high levels ratings start to be more or less equal. E.g. 2300 on lichess is around ~2250 chess.com as far as I know.Before I got any membership on these websites, chess.com was my favourite because I liked to check out articles and blog posts written on there. lichess is probably the best website if you are only interested in the playing experience. chess24's real strength are its videos which the ones one on chess.com and lichess cannot compare to.Chessdotcom and Danny Rensch say that he was auto-banned and later exonerated after manual review. I think this shows that their system prefers false positive classifications because clearly Alireza wasn't cheating. I don't see how that's a controversial opinion. -2.On desktop computer, the only answer is both, chesscom isn't buggy at all there. com for better pieces and board styles, premoves, news and forums, 960 tourneys. lichess for all other tourneys, unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, and a great 3D wooden set to practice OTB. [deleted] • 3 yr. ago.I am a new chess player, currently rated 1500 on lichess against 1.E4 I play the caro kann while it is a good opening, I am getting bored of it 80 percent of the time I play the same advance variation line so I was thinking about switching to a sicillian can anyone recommend good options for someone coming from the caro kannView community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Difference in ELO Lichess and Chess.com . Hey people, I have question. My lichess rating is 1500 (but i can be challenging to 1700-1800 people) and my chess.com rating 1100 (can be challenging to 1300-1400). ... Realistic comparison in lichess rating cs chess.com rating vs ...Maybe try correspondence chess too on Lichess (remember, the non-engine analysis board + opening book is allowed; click around). ... Too much reddit isn't going to have you getting better at chess (if that's your objective). * I think 10+0 is okay to play at too, but don't cry or complain if you find yourself in a bit of a losing streak. Play ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com vs Lichess: rating comparison . Is there a significant difference between same rating adversaries between the two platforms. ... It seems to me there is at the 1600-1700 range, but can be just guessing as I don't have a bunch of games in lichess. Related TopicsLichess assigns 1500 as a provisional rating for new players. I believe chess.com uses 1200 instead. As a result chess.com ratings are about 300 points lower than lichess ratings. That's a bit simplistic since everybody is provisional for a while and the rating jumps quite a lot according to that. There are some differences but in general ... | Crbyrosayon (article) | Mmhoqhj.